Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—The plaintiff-applicant is assailing order dated 7 August 2015, passed by the revisional Court/Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Special Court No. 1, Meerut, in S.C.C. Revision No. 110 of 2010 (Raman Gupta and others v. Shri Anil Kumar Goel), arising from an order passed by the Small Causes Court at Meerut, in Suit No. 85 of 2007 imposing cost on the applicant upon withdrawal of the suit.

2. The facts giving rise to the petition, briefly is, that applicant instituted a suit for eviction and arrears of rent; respondent-defendant contested by filing written statement and deposited arrears of rent, interest and cost at 41,950/rupees to enable the respondent to claim relief against the eviction in view of Section 20(4) of Act 13 of 1972. During pendency of the suit, applicant preferred an application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC withdrawing the entire suit, application was opposed by the respondent/tenant by filing objections, inter alia, contending that respondent had incurred expenses and after withdrawal of arrears of rent deposited, the suit is being withdrawn, therefore, the application should be reje