SUNEET KUMAR
BALLABH LAL – Appellant
Versus
KUKKOO MOTORS FINANCE PVT. LTD. – Respondent
Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—The plaintiff/applicant has approached this Court assailing the orders passed by the Courts below purportedly under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whereby, the parties have been referred to the Arbitrator in terms of the agreement.
2. The facts would reveal that the applicant instituted a suit being Original Suit No. 594 of 1998 (Sri Ballabh v. Kukkoo Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd) for permanent injunction restraining the respondent-finance company from transferring the vehicle, as well as, seeking mandatory injunction to return the vehicle to the applicant. The applicant purchased a truck after obtaining loan of Rs. 1,50,000/- from the respondent-finance company, the applicant defaulted, thereafter, upon termination of the Hire-Purchase agreement the vehicle was seized and auctioned by the respondent-finance company. It is averred in the plaint that the respondent- finance company had taken signatures on blank papers, further, the applicant had not signed any agreement with the respondent-company.
3. The respondent appeared and filed an application under Section 8 contending that the parties be referred to arbitration.
4. Initia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.