SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 260

SUNEET KUMAR
BALLABH LAL – Appellant
Versus
KUKKOO MOTORS FINANCE PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Dinesh Kumar for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents..

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—The plaintiff/applicant has approached this Court assailing the orders passed by the Courts below purportedly under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whereby, the parties have been referred to the Arbitrator in terms of the agreement.

2. The facts would reveal that the applicant instituted a suit being Original Suit No. 594 of 1998 (Sri Ballabh v. Kukkoo Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd) for permanent injunction restraining the respondent-finance company from transferring the vehicle, as well as, seeking mandatory injunction to return the vehicle to the applicant. The applicant purchased a truck after obtaining loan of Rs. 1,50,000/- from the respondent-finance company, the applicant defaulted, thereafter, upon termination of the Hire-Purchase agreement the vehicle was seized and auctioned by the respondent-finance company. It is averred in the plaint that the respondent- finance company had taken signatures on blank papers, further, the applicant had not signed any agreement with the respondent-company.

3. The respondent appeared and filed an application under Section 8 contending that the parties be referred to arbitration.

4. Initia


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top