SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 346

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA
JASMIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anand Prakash Paul and Pramod Kumar Srivastava for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anjani Kumar Mishra, J.—Heard Sri B.B.Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing a notification issued by the Consolidation Commissioner, under Section 6(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act dated 28.9.2015.

3. It has been submitted that earlier consolidation operations were initiated in the unit in 1959. The Unit was brought under consolidation operations, a second time by a notification under Section 4-A(2) on 5.7.2013, however due to political interference, the consolidation operations were not permitted to continue, on account of which, Writ Petition No. 36083 of 2014 was filed by Sukhdev Singh and three others.

4. In this writ petition, a mandamus was sought directing the District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Shahjahanpur to start consolidation operations in pursuance of the gazette notification published on 10.8.2014. A counter affidavit was filed therein stating that a notification under Section 4(2) had been published in the gazette and a mistaken stand had been taken earlier, that this notification had not been is
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top