SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1637

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
(Allahabad Bench)
BEFORE : MS. JASMINE AHMED, MEMBER (J) AND U.K. BANSAL, MEMBER (A)
KAMAL CHANDRA LOHANI .....Applicant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents
(Original Application No. 594 of 2013, decided on 7th October, 2015)

Advocates:
Counsel :
N.P. Singh for the Applicant; D.S. Shukla for the Respondents.

Headnote:Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 – Section 19 – Charge-sheet – Fresh Inquiry/Denovo Inquiry – Inquiry Officer after a detailed inquiry came to its finding that charges alleging against applicant could not be proved but, while disagreeing with report of Inquiry Officer, Disciplinary Authority orderd for fresh inquiry which cannot be sustainable in eyes of law – Tribunal do not find any report has been submitted by Disciplinary Authority before Chairman/Managing Director before ordering for a fresh inquiry in case of applicant, who has already superannuated w.e.f. 31.1.2013 – Impugned order dated 18.4.2013 is quashed – Direction allowed.

       O.A. Allowed.

KAMAL CHANDRA LOHANI vs UNION OF INDIA - 2015 Supreme(All) 1637
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top