SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 255

VIJAY LAKSHMI
UMA SHANKER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
P.N. Tripathi for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

Judgment :

Hon'ble Mrs.Vijay Lakshmi, J.

Vide judgment and order dated 31.3.97 the revisionists were convicted by the First Additional Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur in Case Crime No.942/91 (Surya Narain Vs. Chote Lal and others) under Section 323 & 325 of I.P.C. However, learned Judicial Magistrate, by taking a lenient view and considering the accused persons to be First Offenders, gave them benefit of Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act directing the accused revisionists to be released, on their entering into personal bond of Rs.3000/- and two sureties each in the like amount with condition to maintain peace and good behaviour during the period of probation. Learned Magistrate further directed each of the accused revisionists to pay Rs.500/- as compensation to the victims.

Aggrieved by the order of the learned Magistrate, the accused revisionists preferred Criminal Appeal No.18 of 1997, which was also dismissed after a detailed discussion of evidence by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.

Now the accused revisionists, by means of the instant Criminal Revision are before this Court.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.

Learned counse











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top