PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
RAM RATAN – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWANDEEN – Respondent
Hon’ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.—I have considered the submissions made by learned Counsel for the appellant and Sri Jokhan Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents on admission of second appeal and perused the records.
2. The plaintiffs have file original suit No. 150/1984 for cancellation of sale-deed dated 26.10.1977 executed on behalf of Dhan Dei in favour of defendants No. 1 & 2. The plaint case in brief was that plaintiffs are owner and tenure holder of disputed agricultural property, and are in possession of it. The sale-deed was sought to be cancelled on the grounds that this is a forged deed not executed by Dhan Dei who was not in need of money to sell her property, this deed was without payment of consideration and was illegal because it was executed during consolidation proceedings but without permission of consolidation Court. The plaintiffs also prayed for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants to interfere in the position of disputed property.
3. It has been admitted fact that before initiation of consolidation proceedings name of Smt. Dhan Dei was recorded over disputed land, she executed sale-deed of said property. But during beg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.