SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 358

RAN VIJAI SINGH
SATYENDRA BAHADUR SINGH @ GUDDU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Satyendra Narayan Singh for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents.

2. Through this writ petition, prayer has been made to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 5.11.2014 passed by the District Magistrate, Varanasi in Case No. 35 of 2004 and order dated 28.9.2015 passed by the Divisional Commissioner Varanasi Division Varanasi in Appeal No. C 20141400001738 of 2014.

3. vide order dated 5.11.2014, the District Magistrate has cancelled the fire-arms licence of the petitioner with the liberty to the petitioner to sell the revolver within thirty days. Whereas by the subsequent order dated 28.9.2015, the Divisional Commissioner has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner filed against the order dated 5.11.2014.

4. The facts giving rise to this case are that the petitioner was having Revolver No. 5864/32-Bore on the strength of licence No. 4315. A report was submitted by the police authorities on 16.1.1998 for cancelling the fire-arms licence of the petitioner on the basis of lodging of an F.I.R being Case Crime No. 1 of 1998 under Sections 147, 148,149,307, 302, 506, Indi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top