SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 485

DILIP GUPTA, AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
ROHIT NANDAN SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
U. P. P. S. C. , ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anil Sharma for the Petitioner; Ajay Kumar, Mahendra Narain Singh and Ms. Meenakshi Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The petitioner, who belongs to general category, responded to an advertisement issued by the U.P. Public Service Commission (the Commission) inviting applications for appointments of Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service.

2. The selections are made after holding a preliminary examination and then a main examination followed by interviews. The preliminary examination was conducted by the Commission on 6 September 2015. The preliminary examination consisted of General Knowledge and Law Papers. The General Knowledge paper was of 150 questions carrying one mark each, while the Law Paper also contained 150 questions but of two marks each. Thus, the total marks of General Knowledge were 150 while that of Law Paper were 300. The result of the preliminary examination was declared on 29 September 2015.

3. The petitioner has challenged the key answers of the preliminary examination of two questions namely, Question Nos. 52 and 73 in ‘C’ Series of General Knowledge Paper. The Commission proposed four options (a), (b), (c) and (d) for ea
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top