Hon'ble Mrs. Ranjana Pandya,J.

Challenge in these two appeals is the judgment and order dated 14.04.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Muzaffarnagar in Session Trial No. 62 of 2006 (State Vs. Sanjay and another) and Session Trial No. 1147 of 2007 (State Vs. Imran), both arising out of Case Crime No. 701 of 2005 under Sections 363, 366, 376 (2) (g) IPC, Police Station Nai Mandi, District Muzaffarnagar whereby each of the accused appellants were convicted and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000/- each under Section 363 IPC; five years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.3,000/- each under Section 366 IPC and ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.6,000/- each under Section 376(2)(g) IPC with default stipulation. By the impugned judgment and order it has also been directed that Rs.20,000/- will be paid to the victim as compensation out of the amount of fine so deposited from the accused appellants.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that an application was moved by informant Sarfaraj before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarnagar alleging that accused Imran, son of informant'