By the Court.—Heard Sri P.N.Saxena, senior Advocate on behalf of appellant, Sri Prashant Mathur on behalf of the Cantonment Board, Meerut is present.

2. The facts leading to the present contempt appeal are:

3. The contemnor-appellant as power of attorney holder of one Smt. Pushpa Devi filed Original Suit No. 581 of 1994 seeking a permanent injunction only for restraining the Cantonment Board from demolishing the bungalow, which had been constructed over the property more appropriately described as bungalow No. 210-B, West End Road, Meerut Cantt, Meerut. No other relief was prayed in the said suit. A temporary injunction application was also filed and this application came to be rejected by the Trial Court vide order dated 6.4.1995. Not being satisfied the contemnor-appellant filed First Appeal From Order before the High Court being FAFO No. 298 of 1995, Smt. Pushpa Devi and others v. Cantonment Board, Meerut through its Executive Officer and another. In the said appeal, the appellant described himsef to be the power of attorney of one Smt. Pushpa Devi. In the First Appeal From order, an interim order was granted by the Division Bench of this Court on 13.4.1995, which reads a