RAMESH SINHA, SHAMSHER BAHADUR SINGH
BRAHM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content or specify the key points you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the required summary with references accordingly.
By the Court.—Heard Sri Chandra Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri D.S. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused record.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. Dated 11.06.2016 in Case Crime No. 361 of 2016 under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 I.P.C. at Police Station Sector-58, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Prosecution case in brief is that F.I.R. was lodged by informant, respondent No. 3, Surendra against petitioners alleging that an agreement to sell was executed by petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, namely, Brahm Singh and Budhram on 7.5.2014 in his favour by which it was agreed that sale-deed would be executed of Khasra No. 324 situated in Village Bishanpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar within three months for total consideration of Rs. 39 lacs for which he also made a part payment of Rs. 11 lacs and further gave Rs. 5 lacs to petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. Petitioner No. 3, Sant Ram is a witness of said agreement to sell. It is further alleged that when respondent No. 3 required petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 to execute sale-deed, he came to know that said land has been acq
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.