KRISHNA MURARI, HARSH KUMAR
KUMUD BHARGAVA – Appellant
Versus
SUDHIR BHARAGAV – Respondent
By the Court.—This is an application filed by the appellant seeking review of the judgment dated 10.7.2014 dismissing the appeal.
2. We have heard the review-applicant in person assisted by her husband Sri S. N. Bhargava.
3. First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed by the appellant-plaintiff challenging the judgment and decree dated 5.2.2012 passed by the II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur dismissing the civil suit No. 1560 of 2010 under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. as barred by limitation. After lengthy arguments from both the side, first appeal was dismissed. The judgment of this Court was challenged by the appellant by filing special leave petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court through Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 31685 of 2014 which was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 1.12.2014. After dismissal of the special leave petition by the Hon’ble Apex Court, the appellant has again approached this Court with instant review petition.
4. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondents with respect to the maintainability of review petition after dismissal of special leave petition. Admittedly,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.