A.P.SAHI, VIJAY LAXMI
Md. AYUB – Appellant
Versus
SPEAKER U. P. LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLE VIDHAN BHAWAN U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Shri Ved Prakash Nag, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner claims himself to be the President of the Peace Party which is a political party. He urges that the respondents No. 2 and 3, who were members of his party have allegedly defected and joined another political party as a result whereof they have incurred disqualifications keeping in view the provisions of the Tenth Schedule appended to the Constitution of India. For this, a petition has been filed before the Speaker of the UP Legislative Assembly and which is pending consideration without any orders. Keeping in view the prayers made in this petition, a direction be issued to the Speaker of the Assembly for taking a decision in this regard.
3. The petition has been opposed by Shri Abhinav N. Trivedi, learned counsel on behalf of the State contending that such a direction would not be permissible keeping in view the provisions of Article 212 of the Constitution of India read with Rule 6 of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India. Both the aforesaid provisions are extracted herein under:
“212. Courts not to inquire into proceedings of the Legislature.—(1) The validity of any p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.