Hon’ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.—Before going to the matter of merits of the case in view of the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is constrained to put on record that Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner was heard at length. He had supplied seven compilations from compilation No. 1 to Compilation No. 7 containing synopsis of the case laws in addition to a written submissions in support of the oral submissions made by him in the Court. This has resulted in making the record too bulky. Each compilation contains number of judgements on each point. For example, in compilation No. 2, on the question of consideration of subsequent events, he had referred to ten judgements of this Court and the Supreme Court. In fact one judgement of this Court in the case of Saroj Kumari (deceased) and others v. Suresh Chand and others, in Writ Petition No. 8017 of 2003 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal on 20.12.2012 has been referred at two places with two different equivalent citations and by mentioning different paragraph of the same judgement giving an impression that these are two different judgements on the same point. The Cou