Hon’ble Bala Krisnha Narayana, J.—Since both the aforementioned criminal appeals arise out of the same judgement and order they are being heard and decided together by a common judgment.

2. Criminal appeal No. 1317 of 2008 has been preferred by Santosh while criminal appeal No. 1268 of 2008 has been filed by Smt. Kamla Devi against the judgement dated 15.2.2008 and order dated 16.2.2008 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Mathura in Sessions Trial No. 422 of 2005 (State v. Santosh and two others) arising out of case crime No. 18 of 2005, under Sections 498A, 304B, 316, 201 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P.Act, P.S. Raya, District Mathura by which the appellants have been convicted under Section 3/4 D.P.Act, 498A and 304 B IPC and sentenced to two years imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/- each under Section 3/4 D.P. Act, two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000/- each under Section 498A IPC and imprisonment for life under Section 304B IPC. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. It was further provided that in case the appellant committed default of payment of fine they shall be liable to one month additional imprisonment on each co