SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 973

AJAI LAMBA, RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA II
NARENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Vijay Kumar Pandey for the Petitioners; G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing First Information Report bearing Case Crime No. 0264 of 2015, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C., Police Station Safipur, District Unnao.

2. Allegation against the petitioner in the impugned F.I.R., in brief, is that the petitioner is serving as Survey Lekhpal, prepared record through manipulation, tampering and forging, which does not depict the actual fact.

3. In the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner, the issue of wrong entries in the revenue record was brought before this Court. This Court issued certain directions. In compliance of the directions, the private respondents filed application under Section 33 read with Section 39 of the Revenue Act for correction of record. The adjudicating authority/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Safipur, District Unnao vide order dated 30.7.2015 found tampering in the record and consequently impugned criminal proceedings have been initiated.

4. It has been pleaded on behalf of the petitioner that the issue of correction in revenue record has not attained finality and is pending adjudication before the revisional Court. In suc





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top