SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 15

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
Pati Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shreeprakash Singh, Archana Singh
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Ashutosh

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Sreeprakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 and Sri Ashuthosh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.

2. Undisputedly, facts are that while the petitioner was running a fair price shop of Village Panchayat Barpura Sharki, Block Chamraua, Tehsil Sadar, District Rampur, her wife, Srimati Chandrawati was elected as Gram Pradhan in the year 2015. Consequently, in view of the relevant Government Orders, the fair price shop agreement of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent no.3 vide order dated 14.12.2016 on the ground that the petitioner has incurred disqualification to continue the aforesaid fair price shop.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has heavily relied upon an interim order dated 27.05.2016 in Writ C No. 25803 of 2016, Arjun Singh Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others as under;

“It is contended that the fair price shop license of the petitioner has wrongly been cancelled on the ground that his wife has been elected as Gram Pradhan in the elections held recently, relying upon the Government Order dated 3.7.1990 which is not in force. It is further submitted that the prohibition of



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top