SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1199

DILIP GUPTA, MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
CHANDA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Santosh Kumar Tripathi and Shailendra Singh for the Petitioner; A.S.G.I., N.C.Tripathi and Naresh Chandra Tripathi for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The petitioner, who had responded to the advertisement issued on 3 August 2015 (First Advertisement) inviting applications from married/unmarried male or unmarried female candidates for grant of Short Service Commission in the Indian Army for Judge Advocate General Department (JAG), has filed this petition for quashing the subsequent advertisement dated 18 January 2016 (Second Advertisement) for the reason that the vacancies available against female candidates in the second advertisement were required to be filled-up by the first advertisement itself.

2. The first advertisement stipulated that the total number of vacancies were 14 out of which 10 were for male candidates and 4 were for female. The method of selection was indicated in Clause 6 of the advertisement, which is as follows :

“Method of Selection:

(a) Initial shortlisting of applications will be done by Recruiting Directorate, Integrated HQ of MoD (Army) and the decision of DG Recruiting will be final. Details of the shortlisted online applications will be put on Join Indian Army website. In this































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top