SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1198

V.K.SHUKLA, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sunil Kumar Tripathi for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and A.S.G.I. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Ashok Kumar Lohia is before this Court for following reliefs;

(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 31.5.2016 and 26.8.2016 passed by the respondent No. 3, Assessing Officer & Deputy Labour Commissioner, Varanasi.

(b) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to respondent No. 3 to afford opportunity of hearing and decide the pending representation dated 19.8.2016.

(c) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Notification dated 20.11.2009 and 15.9.2010, passed by the respondent No. 2, State of U.P. appointing Assessing Officer and Cess Collector.

(d) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 not to enforce the impugned order dated 31.5.2016 and 26.8.2016 passed by the respondent No. 3, Assessing Officer & Deputy Labour Commissioner, Varanasi, against the petitioner and not to resort any coercive measure.

(e) issue any other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumst












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top