Hon’ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora, J.—At the outset, it is relevant to mention that in all the afore-captioned writ petition almost similar reliefs have been sought for and as such all the writ petitions have been clubbed together and are being decided by a common judgment.

2. Heard Mr. Sharad Pathak, Mr. Mayankar Singh and Mr. Sreesh Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Asit Kumar Chaturvedi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Ashwani Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the Union of India, Mr. Sanjay Bhasin, learned additional chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as Director General, Medical Education, U.P., Lucknow (opposite parties Nos. 2 and 3), Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 4-Medical Council of India, Mr. Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 5-Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Avadh University, Faizabad, and Mr. S.K. Kalia, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Shraddha Agarwal, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 6-Society for Advancement of Environment Science, Aliganj, through its President Dr. M.C. Saxena.

3. Petitioners, who took admission in MBBS First Year in Dr. M.C