SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1432

NAHEED ARA MOONIS
ABDUL AZIZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Tapan Ghosh and Rakesh Kumar Tripathi for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Respondent.
.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Naheed Ara Moonis, J.—The instant criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 26.2.1982 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor in S.T. No. 467 of 1980 (State v. Abdul Aziz) whereby convicting the appellant under Section 459 I.P.C. with sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment.

2. Heard Sri Vishal Mohan Gupta, learned Advocate as Amicus Curiae on behalf of the appellant and the learned A.G.A. Sri R.D. Yadav on behalf of the State and perused the record.

3. The prosecution case in short conspectus is that the First Information Report was lodged by Chhatra Pal Singh (P.W. 1) on 16.1.1980 at 11 a.m. in respect of the incident occurred at about 3/4 a.m. in the night that one person scaled in his house from the side of the lane after climbing upon his roof. He heard the cracking sound of opening the door, he woke up and had seen in the light of oil lamp (dibiya) that Abuld Aziz the appellant was there he at once caught him and started shouting. At his shouting Ram Pal Singh (P.W.2) Ishwari Singh (P.W.3) soon thereafter came at the spot. Ram Pal Singh was having torch in his hand. The appellant was assaulting with knife on hi





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top