SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1438

DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA
RAM NARESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
D.P. Singh, R.J. Trivedi for the Petitioner; Rajendra Pratap Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora, J.—Mr. D.P. Singh, Advocate, has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining ‘No Objection’ from previous counsel Mr. R.J. Trivedi, Advocate. The same is taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. D.P. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Mr. Rajendra Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 7.

3. Surprisingly, the petitioner, who claims himself to be the Manager of Swami Vivekanand Higher Secondary School, Bilgram, has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking a direction to the Appar Sachiv Madhymic Shiksha Parishad, Kshtriya Karyalaya, Allahabad to withdraw recognition of said Swami Vivekanand Ucchtar Madhyamic Vidyalaya, Hardoi and to communicate its decision to the petitioner forthwith. Petitioner is also seeking a direction to restrain opposite party No. 6-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bilgram, Hardoi to interfere in the property of the Institution.

4. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that Swami Vivekanand Ucchtar Madhyamic Vidyalaya, Hardoi [hereinafter referred to as “Institution”] was recognized f




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top