SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1522

ANIL KUMAR
RAM KRISHNA MISRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Subhash Vidyarthi for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Shri Subhash Vidyarthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri M. E. Khan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and perused the record as well as original record which has been produced before this Court today by the District Magistrate, Lucknow and SD.M., Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow.

By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.8.2012 passed by Up-Ziladhikari/Assistant Collector-First Class-Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow in a proceeding under Section 33/39 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901 (hereinafter referred to as Act) and 7.1.2013 passed by opposite party No. 3.

2. Facts in brief as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner are that the controversy involved in the present case relates to plot No. 1272 (new No. 833) area 6 Bighas 4 Biswa and 5 Biswansi situated in Village-Mandiyaon, Pargana-Mahona, Tehsil-Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow (herein after referred to land in dispute).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that land in dispute has been recorded in the name of the petitioner through his predecessors Pt. Debi Prasad, Pt. Ayodhya Prasad and Pt. Govind Prasad, sons of Pt. Mansa Deen












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top