V.K.SHUKLA, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
DIGIANA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
By the Court.—M/s. Digiana Industries Pvt. Ltd is before this Court with a request to command respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 & 12 not to interfere with the valid transportation of minor minerals from the State of M.P. to State of U.P. by the petitioner specially in the backdrop when petitioner is ready to deposit requisite transit fee, levy and taxes and any other fee made applicable by the State of U.P.
Petitioner, M/s. Digiana Industries Pvt. Ltd claims that it is a valid lease holder in the large part of the State of Madhya Pradesh including the area neighboring the State of U.P. particularly in District Tikamgarh, District Panna, District Chhattarpur and in some of the area of river Betwa i.e. dividing the boundaries of State of U.P. and State of M.P. in district Tikamgarh and Chhattarpur and in some areas of District Panna Ken River and its tributaries i.e. dividing State of U.P. and State of M.P.
2. Petitioner has proceeded to mention that as per the Mineral Policy of State of M.P. the entire mining operation in respect of minor mineral sand was given to the Madhya Pradesh State Mining Corporation Limited which is an undertaking of the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.