SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1540

A.P.SAHI, SANJAY HARKAULI
AWADHESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ravindra Kumar Yadav for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. The prayer in this petition is for quashing of Clause 10 (Gha) of the Government Order dated 17.8.2002 and for issuance of an appropriate order so that the petitioner may be able to get licence of the fair price shop in question which is being withheld on account of want of a Character Certificate from the police authorities.

3. The Character Certificate does not appear to have been issued to the petitioner on account of pendency of a criminal case against him where the applicant-petitioner has been summoned. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the said case is an outcome of a non-cognizable report having been entertained and is an absolutely frivolous complaint made about a dispute over some pathway. It is therefore submitted that mere pendency of a case having been registered in the manner aforesaid should not be an obstruction for issuance of a Character Certificate nor can the same be treated to be a disqualification under the Government Order dated 17.8.2002.

4. Learned counsel has further relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Commis





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top