SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1511

RAN VIJAI SINGH
AGRAWATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Arvind Kumar Mishra for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Arun Kumar Srivastava for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri Arivind Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri R.K. Yadav, holding brief of Sri Arun Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.

2. This writ petition has been filed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 18.10.2016 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Gunnaur, Sambhal, by which the petitioner’s agreement to run fair price shop has been suspended.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Sub Divisional Officer has erred in suspending the agreement of the petitioner for the following reasons:

(a) Because he has suspended the agreement to run fair price shop taking note of the provisions contained under U.P. Scheduled Commodities Control and Distribution Order, 2004 (in short, ‘the Order of 2004); whereas, the Order of 2004 has been repealed on 10.8.2016 and new control order, namely, U.P. Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale & Distribution Control) Order, 2016 (in short, ‘the Order of 2016’) has come into force, therefore, the suspension order could not be passed, taking note of the provisions contained under Order of 2








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top