SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 41

PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
ASHWINI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Supriya Pratik Nagar for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.—Registered sale-deed dated 3.9.2011 was executed by vendors Ranvir Singh, Satvir Singh, Rakam Singh and Ashok son of late Fatte Singh in favour of petitioner Ashwani Kumar son of Kailash Chandra Verma, by which agricultural land of Khasra No. 262, Khatauni No. 00237 situated in village Noornagar, Pargana, Tehsil and District Meerut, area 1.1210 hectare was sold for a consideration of Rs. 1,34,52,000/-. This sale-deed was executed for the agricultural Bhumidhari land. It was mentioned in said sale-deed that property being sold is agricultural land and it is being sold for the agricultural purposes, and there is no tree or boring on this land, but there exists a private tube-well, and it is irrigated by private tube-well, and also that this land is not situated over national highway, district road or link road and not within area of 200 meters of Abadi. Admittedly, at the time of registration of said sale-deed, proper stamp fees was paid according to circle rate prescribed by Collector.

2. After execution of said sale-deed Stamp Case No. 75/13-14/V-03/2012-13, under Section 47-A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 was registered and Collector (Stamp)

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top