SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1357

PANKAJ NAQVI
Aas Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Ankit Agarwal

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Naqvi, J.

1. An FIR as Case Crime No.141/2015, under Sections 379/411 IPC and 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, came to be lodged against the applicant on 7.4.2015, alleging that on a raid conducted by O.P. No.2 at the commercial site of the applicant, 4 tankers bearing registration no. HR 38G 9294, UP 82A 9687, UP 14E 9076 and UP 86B 9842, were in all found to contain 46000 litres of kerosene, meant for public distribution system and as the applicant failed to show any requisite authorization to possess kerosene oil, the said tankers along with kerosene oil were seized, a recovery memo prepared after carrying out requisite formalities. After investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against the applicant on 1.6.2015 under the aforesaid offences and cognizance taken. During the pendency of the case, an FSL report dated 25.8.2015 has been received indicating adulteration in the kerosene oil. The applicant filed an application before the court below, directing the I.O. concerned to take a fresh sample of kerosene from the 4 tankers for its re-analysis, which has been rejected under the impugned order dated 22.9.2015.

2. Heard Sri Ankit Agarwal, learned counsel for the a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top