DILIP GUPTA, SIDDHARTHA VARMA
KAMLA TOMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—The issue that arises for consideration in this petition is whether the delay in filing an application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (the Act) can be condoned.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the delay can be condoned and, therefore, the application that had been filed beyond the time prescribed under Section 28-A of the Act was required to be decided on merits after condoning the delay.
3. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the time period provided for under Section 28-A of the Act for filing the application cannot be extended and, therefore, the application filed by the petitioner which was admittedly beyond the time prescribed cannot be entertained.
4. We have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties.
5. It is alleged that land admeasuring 78 acres situated in Village-Arthala, District Ghaziabad, including the land belonging to the husband of the petitioner, was acquired in 1960 by the State Government. The award was made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer under Section 11 of the Act on 28 September 1977 by adopting the belting system. The mark
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.