SUDHIR AGARWAL, K.J.THAKER
FATEH SINGH ARYA – Appellant
Versus
U. P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORP. LTD. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri Shakti Swarup Nigam, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri V.B. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent, U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited.
2. Petitioner was intially appointed as Assistant Sales Manager, Grade-I in U.P.S.A.I.D.C. on 15.5.2071. Indue course, he was ultimately promoted as Regional Manager, Meerut Region. Petitoner thereafter, retired after attaining age of superannuation on 30.9.2003. However, respondents withheld leave incashment and gratuity of petitioner for almost three years, wherefor, detailed representations were made to U.P.S.A.I.D.C. but in vain. Thereafter, aggrieved by inaction of respondents, petitioner approached this Court by means of Writ Petition No. 41306 of 2006 praying for a writ of mandamus to respondents to pay petitioner’s leave incashment and gratuity. vide order dated 25.8.2008, writ petition was allowed and respondents were directed to pay petitioner’s entire amount of leave incashment and gratuity with 9% simple interest per annum from the date of retirement. Even thereafter, payments were not made and petitioner had to file contempt Petition No. 584 of 2009 before this Court. It is asserted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.