SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 207

SUDHIR AGARWAL, K.J.THAKER
FATEH SINGH ARYA – Appellant
Versus
U. P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORP. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Shakti Swaroop Nigam for the Petitioner; V.B. Mishra and B.D. Pandey for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri Shakti Swarup Nigam, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri V.B. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent, U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited.

2. Petitioner was intially appointed as Assistant Sales Manager, Grade-I in U.P.S.A.I.D.C. on 15.5.2071. Indue course, he was ultimately promoted as Regional Manager, Meerut Region. Petitoner thereafter, retired after attaining age of superannuation on 30.9.2003. However, respondents withheld leave incashment and gratuity of petitioner for almost three years, wherefor, detailed representations were made to U.P.S.A.I.D.C. but in vain. Thereafter, aggrieved by inaction of respondents, petitioner approached this Court by means of Writ Petition No. 41306 of 2006 praying for a writ of mandamus to respondents to pay petitioner’s leave incashment and gratuity. vide order dated 25.8.2008, writ petition was allowed and respondents were directed to pay petitioner’s entire amount of leave incashment and gratuity with 9% simple interest per annum from the date of retirement. Even thereafter, payments were not made and petitioner had to file contempt Petition No. 584 of 2009 before this Court. It is asserted







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top