SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1663

VIKRAM NATH, PRATYUSH KUMAR
RAJESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Rajul Bhargava for the Appellants; A.G.A., D.K. Srivastava and K.P. Pandey for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.

Hon'ble Pratyush Kumar, J.

These two appeals, filed on behalf of the accused-appellants under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., are directed against the judgment and orders dated 12.10.2011 passed by Sri A.K. Ganesh, Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.7, Mathura in Sessions Trial No. 510 of 2008 (State Vs. Rajesh Sharma and another) and Sessions Trial No. 888 of 2008 [State Vs. Sonu @ Mukesh], whereby the appellants were convicted and punished as under:

In Criminal Appeal No. 6133 of 2011, the appellants Rajesh Sharma son of Chaturbhuj Sharma and Shiv Kumar son of Rajesh Sharma have been convicted and sentenced as under:

U/s 302/34 IPC

Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.15,000/- each.

 

In default of payment of fine 6 months RI each.

In Criminal Appeal No. 6322 of 2011, the appellant Sonu @ Mukesh son of Hari Bahu has been convicted and sentenced as under:

U/s 302/34 IPC

Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.15,000/- each.

 

In default of payment of fine 6 months RI each.

Since both the appeals arise out


























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top