SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1745

PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
MOHD. AKBAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Haya Rizvi for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Arun Srivastava for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Respondent no.-5 Sajid was fair price shop dealer of village Khanpur Lakhhi. Respondent no.-3 Sub Divisional Officer has passed order dated 24.2.2016 cancelling the agreement of fair price shop of respondent no.-5. After cancellation of said agreement, present petitioner Mohd. Akbar was allotted said fair price shop. Earlier allottee respondent no.-5 had preferred Appeal No.-C2016130000264 (Sajid Vs. State of U.P.) challenging the order dated 24.2.2016 passed for cancellation of his dealership. In said appeal, he had impleaded present petitioner as respondent. After affording opportunity of hearing, respondent no.-2 Deputy Commissioner had allowed said appeal by judgment dated 14.10.2016, quashed the order dated 24.2.2016 regarding cancellation of agreement of respondent no.-5, and remanded the matter before respondent no.-3 to decide it again on merits within 15 days. This impugned order dated 14.10.2016 has been challenged by petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that impugned order dated 14.10.2016 of respondent no.-2 is erroneous on merits and had been passed without proper appreciation of facts and law, as









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top