2017 Supreme(All) 392
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : OM PRAKASH-VII, J.
OM PRAKASH ....Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Opposite Party
(Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 1988, decided on 6th April, 2017)
Counsel :
A.R.B. Kher, Ruchita Jain and Ray Sahab Yadav for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.
Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Section 307—Murder—Conviction—Injuries are caused by sharp edged weapon but they were simple in nature—From prosecution evidence, it is not established that injuries were caused with intention to kill injured—Therefore, only offence under Section 324 IPC is made out from prosecution evidence—Section 307 IPC is liable to be under Section 324 IPC.
Appeal Partly Allowed.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII, J.
Present Criminal Appeal has been filed by the sole appellant Om Prakash against the judgment and order dated 22.12.1987 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Jhansi in Sessions Trial no. 119 of 1987 (State Vs. Om Prakash), under Section 307 IPC, Police Station Spiri Bazar, Jhansi convicting the appellant under Section 307 IPC and sentencing him to undergo 3 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 500/-.
Heard Sri Ray Sahab Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Abdul Majeed, learned A.G.A. for the State.
Prosecution case in nutshell is that on 5.5.1987 written report (Ext. Ka-1) scribed by Ashok Kumar Saraswat on behalf of K. R. Saraswat (injured) was moved at Police Station concerned mentioning therein that informant K. R. Saraswat was Head Clerk in the Office of District Animal Husbandary, Jhansi and was busy in his work in the office. At about 4.30 P.M. on 5.5.1987 the accused appellant who was posted as Pashudhan Vikas Sahayak, Akseo, Mauranipur, Jhansi came in the office and told that "AAPNE MERA STHANTARAN KAR DIYA HAI ACCHA NAHI KIYA". On this, informant told that transfer is done by the D.L.O. but the accused appellant told that he knows everything and transfer is the act of informant. Informant requested the appellant to go outside but the accused told that he will not leave the office until and unless his transfer is revoked/cancelled and if it is not done he will kill the informant. Again the informant told the accused appellant in anguish to leave the place and do not tease him. On this, accused appellant took out a knife from his pocket and started abusing and stabbing the informant. Informant shouted and rescued himself. It is also mentioned in the written report that injury was caused by the appellant on the stomach, mouth and neck of the injured and due to this informant become unconscious. As soon as the informant regained the consciousness, reached in the office of the Joint Development Commissioner, Jhansi and saved his life. If the informant would not have left the place of occurrence he would have been killed by the accused-appellant. Employees present in the above mentioned office saved and took him to the Medical College. The written report was got prepared by one Ashok Kumar Saraswat son of K. R. Saraswat. On the basis of written report (Ext. Ka-1); chik F.I.R. (Ext. Ka-2) and the G.D. entry (Ext. Ka-3) were prepared at Police Station concerned on the same day at 6.40 P.M. registering at crime no. 145 of 1987 under Section 307 IPC against the accused appellant. Informant was hospitalised in the Medical College, Jhansi. The then City Magistrate, Jhansi on the same day at 8.25 P.M. recorded the statement of the injured K. R. Saraswat as dying declaration, which is Ext. C-2 on record. Injury report Ext. Ka-9 and the X-ray report (Ext. Ka-8) were prepared. Investigating Officer inspected the spot, prepared the site plan (Ext. Ka-5), recorded the statement of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.PC. and after completing necessary formalities submitted charge sheet (Ext. Ka-7) against the accused appellant under Section 307 IPC. Concerned Magistrate took the cognizance of the case and on appearance of the accused, committed the case to the Sessions Court as the matter was exclusively tribal by the Sessions Court.
Accused appeared and charge under Section 307 IPC was framed against him to which he pleaded not guilty claiming trial.
In order to prove its case prosecution examined P.W.-1 Mathura Prasad; P.W.-2 Gokul Prasad; P.W. -3 K. R. Saraswat; P.W.-4 S.I. Ahibaran Singh; P.W.-5 Dr. Neeraj Jain. Court also examined Dr. R. P. Gupta as C.W.-1. Bed Head Ticket relating to the injured was also filed in the court. On completion of the prosecution evidence, statement of the accused appellant under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded. Accused specifically stated that witnesses have made false statement, he is innocent and has not committed present offence. Injure