SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1813

SUDHIR AGARWAL, K.J.THAKER
NIDHI TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL TRIPATHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Usha Devi Singh for the Appellant; Jayant Kumar for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Ms. Usha Devi Singh, learned counsel for appellant and Sri Jayant Kumar, learned counsel for respondent.

2. The appellant has felt aggrieved by dismissal of Suit No. 1105 of 2008 filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 vide impugned judgment dated 7.2.2013 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur.

3. Brief facts are that marriage of appellant was solemnized on 22.12.1992 with the respondent and it was solemnized in Arya Samaj Temple in Govind Nagar at Kanpur. Both had been in deep love of each other. The appellant married the respondent despite opposition of her family members. At the time of marriage the family of appellant gave about one and half lacs rupees to family members of respondent. The appellant went to matrimonial home of respondent and out of married life they had two children. The family members of respondent were pressuring the appellant to pressure family members to see that respondent undertook some vocation and earn money. The appellant time and again requested the respondent to start some business but whenever she would say this the respondent would beat her and would torture her. On 3.3.1995 daughter Diksha was born.


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top