Amar Singh Chauhan, J.

1. This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 13.7.2010, passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly in Criminal Case No. 482 of 2005 (Smt. Surbhi Agrawal vs. Punit Agrawal), under section 125 Cr.P.C. Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly whereby the application of the revisionist-applicant Surbhi Agrawal moved under section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance, was rejected.

2. The facts which are requisite to be stated for adjudication of this revision are that an application under section 125 Cr.P.C. was moved by Surbhi Agrawal alias Sunita stating therein that her marriage was solemnized with the opposite party no. 2 Punit Kumar Agrawal as per Hindu rites and rituals on 24.4.2004. From the date of the marriage, the opposite party no. 2 and her-in-law used to raise demand of Rs. 2 lacs and motorcycle in dowry and, on non-fulfillment of the said demand, they used to beat the applicant- revisionist. They also used to sarcast taunting remark by saying that she occasionally talked with outsider without any hesitation and also impute un-chastity with allegation of gazing the white washner and carpenter etc. The