B.AMIT STHALEKAR
NASEEM AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
1. Heard Ms. Somya Chaturvedi, learned counsel Amicus Curiae and Sri Tarkeshwar Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This is a jail appeal preferred by the accused. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Mohd. Haneef S/o Aivaz Khan lodged an FIR on 18.9.1999 at 6.15 a.m. alleging that he was sleeping in his house when at about 3' O clock in the morning, he heard knocking sound (Khat-Khat). He woke up and went to the terrace with a lighted torch in his hand and saw the accused Nasim Ahmad who belonged to the same mohalla. The informant asked him, who is there? and immediately thereafter, Nasim Ahmad fired upon him with a country made pistol. The informant raised alarm upon which Shakoor S/o Bashir Ahmad and Raees S/o Bashir residents of the same mohalla also reached there with lighted torches. They saw the accused Nasim running away alongwith two other persons in the torch light. The other two persons were not known to the informant and it is stated that he had seen them in the torch light and could recognize them, if they are produced before him. On the FIR the police registered a case under Section 307 IPC against the accused on the same day. On 18.9.1999 th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.