2017 Supreme(All) 710
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : ARUN TANDON AND ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, JJ.
Dr. DHIRENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 55113 of 2015, decided on 31st May, 2017)
Counsel :
Alok Mishra, A.K. Singh, Abhishek Mishra, G.K. Singh and T.P. Singh for the Petitioner; C.S.C., A.K. Goyal, Neeraj Tewari, Pankaj Rai, Shailendra and Smt. Archana Singh for the Respondents.
Headnote:U.P. Regularisation of Adhoc Appointments (on posts within the purview of Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979—Rule 4—Appointment—On basis of forged documents etc.—Challenge against—Petitioners working as Associate Professors questioned appointment of respondent No. 5 as adhoc lecturer in Government Degree College—As well as his subsequent appointment on deputation as Deputy Secretary—Allegedly, respondent No. 5 has misrepresented himself as Scheduled Tribe candidate and secured appointment on basis of a forged mark-sheet—In view of Rule 4 of 1979 Rules services of respondent No. 5 regularised and thereafter he was sent on deputation—No record available anywhere which may show as to which out of 268 adhoc lecturers were appointed against reserved category seats—Respondent No. 5 held had no valid title to hold the public office of adhoc lecturer vide order dated 6.4.1998—And has no right to occupy the post of Deputy Secretary—Respondent No. 5 directed to vacate such office. [Paras 12 to33]
Result; Petition Allowed.
Hon’ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.—Petitioners are associate professors working in Post Graduate Colleges affiliated to Deen Dayal Upadyay Gorakhpur University. They are before this Court in a writ of quo-warranto, questioning appointment of respondent No. 5 as adhoc lecturer in Government Degree College, as well as his subsequent placement on deputation as Deputy Secretary of U.P. Higher Education Services Commission, Allahabad. Petitioners assert that respondent No. 5 has no legal right to hold the public office, and being a usurper, is liable to be ousted in the judicial inquiry under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
2. Accusations are two fold. First, that respondent No. 5 has misrepresented himself as Scheduled Tribe candidate, although he was not so, and secondly that he has manipulated his Post Graduation mark-sheet and secured appointment on the basis of a forged mark-sheet. Both the allegations are denied. Ordinarily, such issues could have been resolved by examining the relevant records. We, however, find ourselves compelled to enter into issues, on facts, as surprisingly all relevant records, wherever they existed, have gone missing. Our persistent endeavor to call upon the Officers of State to investigate such facts stands belied, for the reasons enumerated later. We have, therefore, summoned the original records available, impleaded the examining University to ascertain facts from them, and after hearing the parties at length with reference to records produced, proceed to deliver this judgment.
3. Facts relevant for the case are that State of U.P. issued a Government Order on 8th September, 1997 to fill vacant posts of lecturers in Government Degree Colleges situated in areas both plains and hills of erstwhile State, by adhoc appointment. Such appointments were to be made for an year or till regular selections were made by U.P. Public Service Commission, whichever is earlier, in accordance with qualifications prescribed in the relevant Rules. A committee for such adhoc appointment was constituted, consisting of Director, higher education as its Chairman, and two members of the rank of Joint Director/Principal of Post Graduate Degree Colleges. Government was required to appoint two subject experts. Selection was to be made by allocating 70% weightage to marks secured in educational examinations, 10% weightage for Ph.D., and remaining 20% towards interview. The select list was required to be approved by the State Government and applicable reservation was to be provided in terms of applicable Rules/Government Orders. Consequently, on these terms an advertisement dated 11.9.1997 was issued by the office of Director of Higher Education U.P. at Allahabad. Applications were invited till 30th September, 1997. Adhoc appointment was to be made till 30th June, 1998 or till a regularly selected candidate is sent by the Commission, whichever is earlier. Age limit, qualifications, and procedure of making applications were specified. Fee receipt of Rs. 9/- issued by the treasury, was to be annexed. A declaration was to be made that information furnished therein, is correct. Signatures alongwith date of making application was to be mentioned. The application was to be sent by registered post to the office of Director, Higher Education, U.P. alongwith self stamped envelope.
4. Name of subject experts were provided by the Director of Education (Higher Education) vide his letter dated 27.9.1997. Certain additional experts were also named. Interview was held and selection proceedings were sent to State by the Director Higher Education vide his letter dated 14th January, 1998. 268 candidates were selected, whereas in respect of one candidate, enquiry was being held regarding NET Certificate. State Government approved the selection proceedings and consequently, the Department of Higher Education issued adhoc appointment