SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 448

NAHEED ARA MOONIS
MANISH SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Mohd. Aslam for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Naheed Ara Moonis, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

The instant application has been filed invoking the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceeding pursuant to the summoning order dated 19.2.2016 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shikohabad, District Firozabad in Complaint Case No. 1812 of 2015 (Dushyant Kumar Yadav, Director A.L.P. Milk Foods (Pvt) Limited v. Manish Singhal) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (hereinafter referred as “Act”), P.S. Shikohabad, District Firozabad.

2. The factual matrix of the case in short conspectus is that the opposite party No. 2 filed a complaint on 18.8.2015 before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shikohabad, District Firozabad which was registered as Complaint Case No. 1812 of 2015, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act contending therein that the complainant-opposite party No. 2 had supplied milk food product worth of Rs. 7,98000/- to the applicant’s Firm M/s Chiya Riya Traders, Saharanpur and in discharge of payment of liability issued three cheques bearing




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top