RAN VIJAI SINGH, VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA III
RAJESH KUMAR SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—We have heard Shri N.N. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri M.P. Rai, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, Shri Shiv Ram Dubey, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.5.2014 passed by respondent No. 3, Executive Engineer (City), Electricity Distribution Division Ist, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur, by which he has directed to disconnect the electricity connection of the petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Shukla house No. 388 with immediate effect. The aforesaid order appears to have been passed taking note of the order of this Court dated 8.2.2013 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 54464 of 2013.
3. The facts of this case, in brief, are that the petitioner and respondent No. 6 are real brothers and respondent No. 5 is their mother. With respect to the electricity connection in house No. 388, a dispute arose in between the parties after the death of the father in the year 1998. It is the case of the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.