SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 812

SIDDHARTHA VARMA
NIRMAL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
AWADH BEHARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.V. Jaiswal, K.M. Dayal, Rahul Sahai, Rahul Sripat and S.K. Chaubey for the Appellant; L.N. Pandey, Arvind Srivasta, B. Singh, K.S. Kushwaha, L.P. Singh and Rishabh Kumar for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Siddhartha Varma, J.—This is a defendant’s second appeal against the judgement and decree dated 29.7.1985 passed by the Civil Judge, Ballia, in First Appeal No. 45 of 1983 whereby the appeal of the plaintiff respondent against the judgement and decree dated 17.1.1983 in Original Suit No. 340 of 1981 was allowed and the suit was decreed.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the predecessor in interest of the plaintiff Mahaveer, who had five sons, had various properties which included the property in question. The pedigree of the family of Mahaveer is reproduced here as under:

Mahaveer Singh

Hari Prasad

Chhotey Lal

Madhuban Prasad

Ram Chandra Prasad

Mahadev Prasad

Bela Kunwari (wife)

 

Badri Narain

Dwarika

Kanhaiya Lal

 

Panna Lal

Ghanshyam Das

 

Awadh Bihari 

Poonam Chand

Jagat Narain

UdhauJi

      3. Three out of the five sons of Mahaveer, namely, Chhotey Lal, Maduban Prasad and Mahadev Prasad died issue-less. Hari Prasad had three sons, namely, Badri Narain, Dwarika, and Kanhaiya Lal, whereas Ram Chandra















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top