Hon’ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.—Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the plaintiff/landlord/revisionist. No one appears on behalf of the defendant/tenant/respondent even in the revised call.

2. Today the case is listed peremptorily.

3. This revision has been filed challenging the order dated 26.3.2012 in S.C.C. Case No. 02 of 2002 (Ramesh Chand Gupta v. Pawan Kumar Jain) passed by the Additional District Judge/Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Area), Jhansi.

4. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the revisionist is the owner and landlord of House No. 528 (Old No. 40), Kutchehri Crossing, Jhansi. He has given two shops of the said building on rent to the defendant/respondent @ Rs. 800/- per month under Rent Agreement dated 1.10.1987 effective for 11 months. The defendant/respondent also gave Rs. 30,000/- as advance money to be returned after vacation of the shops. According to the revisionist/landlord, the defendant/respondent has neither paid rent after 1.8.2001 nor deposited house tax and water tax since the commencement of tenancy and as such the revisionist/landlord sent notice dated 24.10.2001 through his counsel to the defendant/respondent termin