SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1027

ARUN TANDON, KRISHNA PRATAP SINGH
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
FATEH BAHADUR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.C., Vivek Shadilya and Waseem Alam for the Appellants; Gajendra Pratap Singh, H. Singh, Ashok Khare and Gautam Baghel for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—We have heard Sri Vivek Shadilya, Additional Chief Standing Counsel on behalf of the State and Sri Gajendra Pratap Singh, Advocate assisted by Sri Gautam Baghel, Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 7 in the present appeal.

2. This Intra-Court Appeal has been filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.4.2013 passed in writ petition No. 53510 of 2008.

3. Facts in short relevant for deciding the present appeal are as under :

Writ petitioners-respondents before this Court were appointed as Collection Amin in the Revenue Department of State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners were admittedly sent on deputation for working as Collection Amin in the Trade Tax Department of the State of U.P.

4. The exact date on which each of the petitioner was sent on deputation has specifically been taken note of in the order of the learned Single Judge and it is between December, 1976 to August 1991. While the petitioners were still on deputation in Trade Tax Department of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top