ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : BHARAT BHUSHAN AND S.K. AGARWAL, JJ.
BADLAU AND OTHERS ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 3480 of 2004, decided on 24th July, 2017)
Counsel :
Mohd. Khalid, Akhilesh Kumar, C.K. Singh, Hare Krishna Mishra, I.M. Khan, Kameshwar Singh, N.D. Rai Amicus Curiae, P.S. Yadav, Ramesh Chandra Gupta IInd, Upendra Kumar Singh and Santosh Kumar for the Appellants; A.G.A. for the Respondent.
Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Section 302/34—Murder—Conviction—Three eye-witnesses presence on spot is quite natural—Incident occurred at their residence, therefore, their presence on spot cannot be doubted unless contrary is proved by trustworthy evidence—Even defence witnesses have not disputed presence of these witnesses—Murders were committed on account of land dispute—Entire series of incident and evidence clearly shows that both accused persons can be held guilty of offence of murder with aid of Section 34 IPC—Conviction uheld.
Appeal Dismissed.
Bharat Bhushan, J.
1. In this triple murder case, appellants Badlau and Rahmat were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC) and appellants Sardar and Raj Bali were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. All the four appellants were sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/- with default stipulation by the impugned judgment dated 7.7.2004 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2 (FTC) in Sessions Trial No 133 of 1990 arising out of Case Crime No. 182 of 1989, Police Station (PS) Ghazipur, District Fatehpur.
2. Prosecution has alleged that informant Lala (P.W.-1) and his deceased father Jairam were lying on a bed in front of Varandah of their house while deceased Chunna and Bulla were sleeping in inside room of the same house. His mother Smt Lachui (P.W.-4) was also sleeping in Varandah of the courtyard. At about 10 p.m. in the night of 21.11.1989, the appellants Badlau and Rahmat armed with country made pistols and appellants Sardar and Rajbali armed with Lathis arrived suddenly. Appellant Badlau shot Jairam, his father on the exhortation of co-appellant Rahmat. Deceased Chunnu came out of the room. Appellant Rahmat shot him dead. Thereafter, all the appellants entered the interior of the house and also shot Bulla who also sustained grievous injuries. Commotion attracted several persons. Witnesses Prakash (P.W.-2), Dulare @ Dulla (D.W.-3) and Chota (not examined), came armed with lathi and flashlight. On their challenge, accused persons fled away from the spot. It is claimed that burning lamp at the spot was giving sufficient light wherein appellants were identified. Allegations is that there was some land dispute between the rival parties and appellants had infact abused and humiliated them even prior to this incident. They had threatened to destroy the whole family of deceased persons. No report of such threat was lodged because of intervention of wise men of the village.
3. Informant lodged the First Information Report (FIR) Ex-Ka-1 at 23.45 p.m. at P.S. Ghazipur located 5 kms away from the place of occurrence i.e. within 75 minutes of the incident. A chick report Ex-Ka-16 was carved out. It is pertinent to point out that initially this report was lodged under Sections 302, 307 IPC as only Chunna had died at that point of time. It is alleged that initially Jairam and Bulla were taken on Bullock-Cart to P.S. Ghazipur. FIR Ex Ka-1 was lodged and thereafter both the injured were sent to District Hospital Fatehpur on the police Jeep. Injured Bulla died in the same night. Subsequently Jairam also died in few days i.e. on 2.12.1989.
4. Investigation was taken over by Station House Officer (SHO) Ghanshyam Ahirwar (P.W.-6). After sending both injured to the District Hospital in police jeep, he reached village Sukaiti, the place of occurrence in the same night but could not conduct any proceeding on account of insufficiency of light. Body of Chunna was lying in the village so inquest proceedings were initiated somewhere around 6.30 a.m. in the morning. Inquest report of Chunna (Ex-ka-8) is available on record. Further documentation was done and cadaver of Chunna was sent for postmortem.
5. Investigating Officer (IO) also recorded the statements of informant Lala (P.W.-1), Prakash (P. W.-2), Smt Lachui etc and prepared site plan (Ex-Ka-11). Sample of blood stained earth and simple earth were lifted and Fard Ex-Ka-12 prepared. One empty cartridge of 12 bore was also recovered from the place of occurrence (Fard Ex-Ka-13). A burning lamp and torch of witnesses were also taken into possession and thereafter given in the custody of same persons with requisite instructions (Ex-Ka-14). Bulla died in the hospital in the same night. His inquest proceedings were initiated in the hospital. His inquest report Ex-Ka-18 is available on record.
6. As stated earlier, injured Jairam succumbed to his injuries on 2.12.1989. His inquest report Ex-Ka-19 is also available o