ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI, SATYA NARAIN AGNIHOTRI
SAHDEO – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
Arvind Kumar Tripathi, J.
1. The present criminal appeal No. 1833 of 1984 filed on behalf of the accused-appellants Sahdeo, Shatrughan Singh, Shiv Saran alias Munshi Dubey and Shiv Das and the connected criminal appeal No. 1939 of 1984 filed on behalf of the accused-appellant Phool Singh have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 5.7.1984 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in Session Trial No. 123 of 1982 State Vs. Sahdeo and 4 Others, arising out of Case Crime No. 121 of 1981, P.S. Asothar, convicting and sentencing the accused-appellants Sahdeo, Shatrughan Singh and Shiv Saran, under Section 148 IPC for two years R.I., under Section 302/149 for life imprisonment and under Section 201 IPC for two years R.I. Accused-appellants Shiv Das and Phool Singh, under Section 147 IPC for one year R.I., under Section 302/149 IPC for life imprisonment and under Section 201 IPC for two years R.I. with the direction that all the sentences shall run concurrently. Hence, both the aforesaid appeals were heard and the same are being decided jointly by a common order.
2. During pendency of the appeal, accused-appellants Sah
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.