SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BHARAT BHUSHAN, K.J.THAKER
Prem Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
From Jail, Manish Tiwary (A.C.), Sudist and Yogesh Srivastava for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

(Oral : Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J)

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 16.4.1999 in Sessions Trial No. 853 of 1996 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad, convicting accused-appellant Prem Lal under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default, six months further imprisonment under Section 302 IPC.

2. The accused is in Jail for about 22 years more particularly December, 1995. It is submitted that consumption of liquor is harmful and it has proved so in the present case. The father is alleged to have done away with his two minor children when he in the evening got intoxicated and was returned back from his labour work and his wife also returned home from labour work. He demanded money from her. On refusal to pay, he got annoyed. He was so agitated as per the say of the counsel for the appellant that he lost his mental balance and has, therefore, submitted that if this Court does not accept the submission that it is a clean case of acquittal, the second option available to him





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top