BHARAT BHUSHAN, K.J.THAKER
BACHCHU @ TUNDA @ NABAB SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
1. By way of this appeal accused-appellant Bachchu@Tinda@Nabab Singh was tried in Sessions Trial No. 243 of 1996 for the alleged offence under Sections 376, 302 and 201 I.P.C. in First Information Report lodged with Police Station-Kotwali, District-Farrukhabad.
2. Trial Court convicted accused under Section 302 I.P.C. for life, under Section 376 I.P.C. for rigorous imprisonment for life and under Section 201 I.P.C. for rigorous imprisonment of 3 years alongwith fine and in default 2 years of rigorous imprisonment. The learned Judge passed the judgement on 1.8.1997 in Sessions Trial No. 243 of 1996. The accused was under trial prisoner.
3. The incident is of 1996, the appeal was preferred in 1997, we are in the year 2017. The accused is in jail since 1996 i.e. since the date of offence.
4. The brief facts leading to the filing of prosecution case against the accused are that an F.I.R. was lodged by informant P.W. 1 Suresh father of deceased-victim stating that on 12.1.1996 at 7:30 a.m. accused Bachchu @ Tinda @ Nabab Singh, S/o Ram Kishan came at the shop of informa
H.D. Sikand Vs. CBI and Another (2017) 2 SCC 166
Hanumant Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in AIR 1952 SC 343
Mohd. Mannan Vs. State of Bihar (2011) 5 SCC 317
Sharad Vs. State of Maharashtra
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Shankar Lal G Dixit Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (1981) 2 SCC 35
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.