ARUN TANDON, SUNITA AGARWAL
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Respondent
Hon’ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.—This bunch of nearly 100 special appeals and writ petitions raises common questions of fact and law with regard to the right of regularization of persons, who were appointed as daily wage Registration Clerks in the Registration department of the State of U.P. The appointment of Registration Clerks is regulated under the U.P. Registration Manual, (Para 94-A and Para 95) (herein after referred to as the ‘Registration Manual’).
Introduction :
2. The litigation which commenced in the year 1991 spilled over two and a half decades and after several rounds of litigation came up before us in this bunch, categorized as ‘Registration Clerks Bunch’. The daily wage Registration Clerks who were appointed some time in the year 1983-84 for a period of three months in a financial year with the sanction of the Governor, for the purpose of disposal of arrears of copying work in the registration offices in the State of U.P., continued to work under the orders/directions of this Court.
3. First round of litigation commenced in the year 1991 on advertisement being made for regular appointment on the post of Registration Clerks in the district level Registration
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.