Hon’ble Yashwant Varma, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.C. Tiwari, learned counsel who has appeared for the contesting respondents.

2. The petitioner calls in question the order dated 30 May 2016 passed by the Executive Officer of the Cantonment Board upholding their decision to withdraw the appointment made in favour of the petitioner on the ground of suppression of material information.

3. The facts on which there is no dispute are as under.

4. The petitioner was appointed as a Safai Karmachari on probation in terms of an order dated 12 October 2007. This appointment was preceded by an application made by the petitioner seeking appointment in the Cantonment Board and also furnishing a declaration that he was not involved in any criminal case.

5. It appears that after the petitioner had been appointed, a First Information Report came to be lodged on 29 November 2007. This FIR ultimately upon conclusion of investigation resulted in filing of a police report dated 8 April 2008 recommending closure. It is also not disputed that this final report was accepted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in terms of an order dated 29 June 2014. It becomes relevant to