SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1189

ARUN TANDON, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
NATTHI MAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Saroj Yadav for the Petitioners; C.S.C., Anuj Kumar, Prashant Shukla and Prem Chand for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri Saroj Yadav and Sri Rahul Mishra, Advocates on behalf of the writ petitioners, Sri Shashi Nandan, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Prashant Shukla Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 4 and Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1. Nobody is present on behalf of respondent No. 2 nor anybody is present on behalf of respondent No. 3 despite counter-affidavit having been filed on their behalf.

2. This public interest litigation has been filed by 5 persons, resident of different areas in the district of Bulandshahr and some of whom are stated to be residing within the territorial limit of Nagar Palika Parishad Anoopshahr, District-Bulandshahr.

3. Petitioners claim to be public spirited persons. By means of the present writ petition they seek quashing of the lease deed dated 26th June, 2009 executed by the Municipal Board, Anoopshahr, Bulandshahr in favour of respondent No. 4, namely, Jai Prakash Sewa Sansthan, having its registered Head Office at J.A. House 63, Basant Lok, Basant Vihar, New Delhi and the corrigendum issued in that regard dated



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top