ANIRUDDHA SINGH
JAYANTI PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh, J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionists and the learned AGA for the State.
2. This revision has been filed by revisionists namely Jayanti Prasad, Rajesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Smt. Mando Devi, Virendra Kumar Gupta and Smt. Bhama @ Manjoo against order dated 1.9.1997 passed by Sri Anil Kumar, Judicial Magistrate III, Bareilly in Criminal Case No. 414 of 1997 (State vs. Anil Kumar Gupta and Others), Crime No. 297/93 under Section 498-A IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Fatehganj East, District Bareilly whereby charges have been framed against revisionists and Anil Kumar Gupta, husband of opposite party No. 2/informant.
3. Opposite party No. 2/informant lodged an FIR dated 10.12.1993 stating therein that marriage of opposite party no. 2/informant was solemnized with accused Anil Kumar Gupta, son of revisionist No. 1 Jayanti Prasad on 4.5.1992. Revisionists demanded Rs. 40,000/- scooter and Maruti as dowry in second Bidai. Her husband had gone back to Fatehganj on 3.12.1993. On 5.12.1993 her father-in-law took her from Bareilly to Fatehganj. On the next day, above revisionists and her husband beat her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.